![]() Thank you for your very kind and wise guidance. ![]() If correct, your Pi doesnt acquire an IP via DHCP anymore and instead, those details are set statically: $ tail /etc/nfīest to restore that line to default: # Inform the DHCP server of our hostname for DDNS. This setting is intended for if the host were to acquire an IP via DHCP. If hostname is an empty string then the current Sends hostname to the DHCP server so it can be registered ![]() lighttpd has an additional nf file with "server.port = 8080". I understand this is something to do with 'loopback' Interestingly running the inbuilt generate debug log also fires up dhcp-discover and generates the same error Įverything appears to be working so do I just ignore the lo warning, or does it suggest something in my setup needs attention? "Warning in dnsmasq core: no address range available for DHCP request via lo" However, if I then run pihole-FTL dhcp-discover I get a new warning. This has been done and the problems described appear to have gone away. "# Inform the DHCP server of our hostname for DDNS. I subsequently discovered that I had foolishly not amended the dhcpdc file to reflect the hostname under I followed your wise guidance and rebooted. Thank you for taking the time to respond. …and then the “.unable to resolve host….” warning returns.Ĭan any kind soul please give me a shove in the right direction? "127.0.0.1 pihole-server" from the Hosts file Not giving name pihole-server to the DHCP lease of 192.168.1.251 because the name exists in /etc/hosts with address 127.0.0.1" Not giving name pihole-server.lan to the DHCP lease of 192.168.1.251 because the name exists in /etc/hosts with address 127.0.0.1 This nag goes away and I get another warning “sudo: unable to resolve host pihole-server: Name or service not known” ![]() When updating Pi or restarting services I get You can also retrieve the host's ip address from within a docker container depending on your OS and docker version:Īs of Docker v18.03+ you can use the hostname to connect to your Docker host.I am stuck in a circle and have no idea how to escape. localhost:8080 However you need to remember that ports are a scarce resource and you cannot have conflicting port listeners in different containers when you do this. This should allow you to access the host machine via listening port of the host machine. service1:80 -> host:8080, service2:80 -> host:8081).ĭocker run YOUR_IMAGE -network="host" will bind the container network adapter to that of the host machine. 80), but in a way that can be mapped to unique ports on the host machine (e.g. This allows one to easily spin up multiple containers which might all listen on the same port (e.g. usr/bin/docker daemon -H fd://ĭocker container can reach DNS but not resolve hostsīy default creating a new docker container also creates a virtual network that separates the docker network environment from the host network environment (somewhat). From my host I can ping google $ cat /etc/nf
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |